BIS allows the possibility to ban cryptocurrencies because of risks for central banks
The crypto sector has not yet “grown large enough or sufficiently interconnected with TradFi to threaten financial stability,” economists said
13.01.2023 - 16:30
284
2 min
0
After a series of blowups in the crypto industry, the Bank of International Settlements is exploring de-risking policies for central banks, with a ban on crypto activity one potential option.
Economists Matteo Aquilina, Jon Frost and Andreas Schrimpf disparagingly wrote in a Thursday bulletin that despite inefficiencies recently seen in the space, crypto proponents still believe decentralization and blockchains are solutions rather than problems.
“Recent developments underscore that the decentralization in crypto and DeFi markets is illusory,” they said, reiterating the bank’s stance from last year.
“The vision of crypto proponents is to do away with financial intermediaries, yet to function and achieve a meaningful scale, crypto markets rely heavily on centralized entities for several reasons.”
The economists pitched three potential options to tackle crypto risk in the wild. “A crucial element to be considered when selecting which options to pursue is the ability to enforce any rule that is introduced, including ensuring that the resources needed to do so are on hand,” the report states.
Ban specific crypto activities
This is the “extreme option,” per the authors, involving either an entire ban or a targeted one that eliminates potential harm to the financial system. This would mean investors wouldn’t be exposed to the misconduct of crypto service providers, the economists said.
They admitted that implementing a ban would be difficult in terms of enforcement. Decentralized crypto activities are borderless, so the ban would work better if focused on centralized intermediaries (an apparent reference to exchanges or payment providers).
“But the activity could move to jurisdictions that do not impose the ban and investors may find ways to evade it,” BIS researchers wrote. “The main downside is that any useful innovation from crypto would be lost or delayed.”
Isolate crypto from TradFi and the real economy
This course of action would see crypto become more of a niche activity — a good thing as it wouldn’t be interconnected with TradFi (traditional finance), according to the economists.
How would that work?
“By limiting the flow of funds into and out of it and by limiting other connections with TradFi.” The authors then acknowledged this firewall-like approach wouldn’t be effective, again due to the borderless world of crypto.
Regulate the sector just like TradFi
The third option would seek to fit digital assets into existing regulations at all costs.
Authorities would be encouraged to map activities in the crypto industry to their counterparts in TradFi, then apply variants of existing regulations for those sectors to regulate crypto.
“This approach would ensure consistency in regulating financial activities — whether performed by crypto players or TradFi — and help to promote the policy goals at the core of existing regulatory frameworks,” the report states.
This material is taken from the website blockworks.co
Useful material?
Crypto regulations
The platform will launch after meeting the preconditions of the local exchange authority
Dec 9, 2024
Market
The $1,1 billion figure was reached after the bitcoin correction
Dec 6, 2024
Crypto regulations
By early January, all open positions and loans of local users will be closed and repaid automatically
Dec 5, 2024
Trends
According to the fund’s analysts, stablecoins with a peg to the US dollar will gain popularity as the main means of settlement
Dec 5, 2024
Market
The platform takes no fees and allows any user without programming knowledge to launch their own asset in a few clicks
Dec 4, 2024
Incidents
Alex Mashinsky faces up to 30 years in prison on two counts of fraud
Dec 4, 2024