From “Bitcoin Prophet” to Controversial Figure: Who Is Davinci Jeremie?

The cryptocurrency market is full of influencers who monetize their audiences through questionable schemes. Yet Davinci Jeremie stands out even among them. According to GetBlock AML Research, the man once called a “Bitcoin prophet” is now facing accusations related to promoting suspicious crypto projects.

From “Bitcoin Prophet” to a Controversial Reputation

In May 2013, Davinci Jeremie uploaded a low-quality YouTube video that later became the foundation of his fame. In it, he gave a simple piece of advice: buy at least $1 worth of bitcoin. At the time, BTC was trading at around $113.

For the small number of viewers who followed his advice, the investment turned out to be extremely profitable. Jeremie quickly went from a regular crypto enthusiast to someone many began calling the “Bitcoin prophet.”

Thirteen years later, that video is no longer just a piece of internet history. It has become a powerful tool of influence.

Source: youtube

Today Jeremie operates from Dubai and speaks to an audience of more than 800,000 followers. Over time, he managed to turn his reputation as an early bitcoin supporter into a steady source of influence in the crypto market.

The pattern is fairly simple: he reminds his audience about his successful 2013 prediction, promotes lesser-known tokens or new crypto projects, and his followers’ trust helps push those assets sharply higher. Early investors can then sell their tokens for profit.

However, blockchain data and investigations by independent analysts — including well-known crypto researcher ZachXBT — suggest a different story. According to them, Jeremie didn’t just survive the turbulent decade of crypto markets. They claim he built a lifestyle around the trust of his audience, effectively using it as liquidity for various projects.

ZachXBT Investigations: From Prophet to “The Most Unlucky Token Holder”

ZachXBT is a well-known blockchain investigator who has exposed numerous questionable crypto projects and influencers in recent years. In his reports, he didn’t just criticize Jeremie — he presented specific evidence and on-chain data.

According to his findings, the image of the “Bitcoin prophet” hides another reality: Jeremie allegedly evolved from an early crypto enthusiast into an active promoter of dubious projects.

The YoloCoinsIO Scam (April 2022)

In April 2022, Jeremie actively promoted a project called YoloCoinsIO. The result was swift: in less than a day, the project effectively disappeared and the token’s price collapsed to zero.

ZachXBT tracked the situation in real time and labeled the project a direct scam on the BSC network. According to him, liquidity vanished almost immediately after Jeremie’s followers began buying the token.

When criticism started to grow, Jeremie said he had personally lost around $10,000. Many in the crypto community viewed that explanation skeptically, noting that influencers often claim losses themselves after promoting failed projects.

Reputation and the Title of “Worst Token Holder”

By July 2024, ZachXBT publicly called Jeremie “the worst token holder of all time” — a phrase that quickly became part of his reputation in the crypto community.

The logic behind the criticism was simple. Jeremie gained enormous credibility thanks to his early bitcoin prediction in 2013. Instead of preserving that reputation, critics say he spent years promoting questionable projects for relatively small payouts.

The investigator also suggested that the trust built more than a decade ago may have been used as a tool to influence his audience — especially when it came to little-known tokens or early crypto presales.

How the Token Promotion Model Works

According to analysts, the structure of Jeremie's promotions often follows the same pattern.

First, he highlights a little-known asset with a small market capitalization. Then he uses social media to drive interest and push the price higher.

To build credibility, he frequently claims to personally hold a large amount of the token or predicts strong price growth.

When retail interest peaks and the price surges, early holders often sell their tokens. After the price drops, Jeremie typically deletes promotional posts, blames the project’s developers, or says he also ended up among the victims.

The Expert Image — and Its Contradictions

At the same time, Jeremie works to maintain the image of an experienced crypto market participant. On LinkedIn, for example, he regularly posts warnings about scam crypto wallets and dangerous projects, presenting himself as someone fighting fraud.

Davinci Jeremie today

He also frequently criticizes other cryptocurrencies. For instance, he has publicly called XRP “a scam you can only play like a casino.”

This kind of rhetoric helps shift attention away from his own promotional campaigns and reinforces his image as a supporter of “pure bitcoin.”

The NFT Era and Disappearing Evidence

Promotion was not limited to tokens. During the NFT boom, Jeremie actively promoted collections including the project Little Doodles.

That project also ended in controversy. The launch failed, the development team disappeared, and some users reported that the NFTs they purchased had even vanished from their crypto wallets.

One affected user wrote directly to Jeremie, saying their NFTs disappeared after the launch. The message reportedly went unanswered.

Over time, many of Jeremie's promotional posts about controversial projects began disappearing from his social media accounts. However, replies from users and complaints from victims often remained, leaving a digital trail.

A List of Failed Projects

Even when larger crypto projects were involved, their price patterns often looked similar: a sharp rise after promotion followed by a major decline.

Examples frequently mentioned include:

• Star Atlas (ATLAS) — surged to $0.267 before falling nearly 99%
• LooksRare (LOOKS) — climbed to $7.10 before losing about 99% of its value
• Arkham (ARKM) — rose to $3.98 and later dropped roughly 87%
• Core DAO (CORE) — jumped to $6.14 before falling more than 95%
• TrueFi (TRU) — increased to $1.02 before declining about 90%

Personal Tokens and Accusations From Followers

Additional criticism surrounded tokens linked to Jeremie himself — DVINCI and Peon.

Some users claimed they bought these assets because they trusted his reputation and later lost money after the prices collapsed. Social media posts describing these losses appeared online, many of which reportedly received no response from Jeremie.

New Projects, Same Pattern

A similar pattern allegedly appeared in other projects, including:

• WAFFLES
• ORC
• WAOWO
• PeiPei

In many cases, the tokens saw rapid price increases followed by steep declines.

The Story of the $1 Token

In March 2026, the crypto community created a token called $1, inspired by Jeremie's famous 2013 video about buying one dollar worth of bitcoin.

Instead of supporting the original project, Jeremie began interacting with a copycat token created by a third-party developer.

According to blockchain researchers, trading activity around that token may have generated fees directed to the developer and associated parties. After the token’s market cap surged, its price quickly collapsed.

Source: X.com

When users began asking questions, Jeremie said he had never directly told people to buy the token — only that he had mentioned its existence.

Response to Criticism

Jeremie often responds to accusations with sarcasm. In one message, he wrote:

“I’m grateful for the hate. It means I matter.”

He has also joked that he lost all his bitcoins in a “boating accident” — a common meme in the crypto community.

Such responses allow him to avoid directly addressing the allegations.

Conclusion: A Reputation Under Pressure

Today, Davinci Jeremie's name is still closely tied to that famous 2013 video. For many followers, it remains a symbol of early belief in bitcoin.

But the controversies of recent years — including the story surrounding the $1 token — have intensified the debate about his reputation.

For some, he remains the man who recognized bitcoin’s potential early. For others, he has become an example of how early success can be turned into a powerful tool of influence in the crypto market.